The leading association for the stock and executive compensation profession
Join a professional community 6,000+ members strong
Continue your investment in your professional development and community
Our member care center is here to assist you
Country-specific guidance for stock plan design and administration
Connect with a chapter in your area
Learn more about and engage your peers
Attend an NASPP event for unbeatable professional development and networking
Ask, find and provide answers to burning industry questions
Professional development to keep you at the top of your game
Expert industry perspectives and guidance for your daily work
Enrich you career and discover new opportunities
Be there for the 27th annual event Sept. 16-19, 2019 in New Orleans!
In a flurry of acronyms, the DOL (Department of Labor) and the IRS (I'm sure you all know what this acronym stands for) signed an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) to improve agency coordination to address worker misclassification. A number of states are also participating in the agreement.
DOL and IRS Sign MOUThe agreement provides that the DOL will share information with the IRS and the participating states to address workers classified as contractors that should really be treated as employees. Worker misclassification is a target of the IRS's current employment tax research study, which I've blogged about before ("IRS Auditing Stock Compensation," June 7, 2011). This MOU will give the IRS additional information to use in its audits.
At the same time, the IRS also announced a voluntary worker classification settlement program, further demonstrating their focus on this issue.
Misclassifying a worker that should be an employee as a consultant can result in a host of legal issues, from benefits that the individual should have been accorded (such as the right to medical benefits and vacation time), tax withholding considerations, overtime pay, and unemployment benefits, to name just a few.
This probably seems like a topic that doesn't impact stock plan administration that much. Worker classification is determined by HR and/or payroll; the stock plan administration group most likely just assumes their determination is correct and treats each individual's options and awards accordingly. And, I can't think of any reason why stock plan administration should question the classification made by HR/payroll; it's unlikely you have sufficient information to determine an individual's employment status.
But, while stock plan administration may not be involved in classifying workers as employees or consultants, you should be aware of the impact misclassification can have on stock compensation awarded to the individuals in question.
Tax Withholding on Options and Awards
Of course, the first issue that comes to mind is tax withholding. Individuals classified as consultants aren't subject to tax withholding. If these individuals should have been treated as employees, however, then taxes should have been withheld on all of their compensation, including their NQSOs and stock awards. Failure to withhold the appropriate taxes can result in penalties to the company up to the amount of the taxes that should have been withheld, as well as interest and administrative penalties.
In addition, the company should have made matching FICA payments on all of the individual's compensation, also including NQSOs and stock awards. This is even more of a mess because consultants don't pay FICA, they pay self-employment tax, which is equal to both the individual and company portion of FICA. The misclassified workers will have overpaid their taxes because, as employees, they would only have been responsible for the employee portion of FICA.
The company's Section 423 ESPP is a significant concern. By law, substantially all employees of the company have to be allowed to participate in the ESPP, but, of course, also by law, consultants aren't permitted to participate. Where consultants should have been treated as a employees, however, it is likely that they should have been permitted to participate in the ESPP. Where an individual that should have been allowed to participate is excluded from the ESPP, the entire offering(s) that the individual should have been allowed to participate in can be disqualified. A mistake here could impact not just the misclassified individual but all other employees participating in the ESPP. When assessing your company's risk with regards to worker misclassification, this is an important consideration.
Thanks to McGuireWoods for the alert that gave me the idea for this blog entry.
Conference Hotel Almost Sold OutThe 19th Annual NASPP Conference is quickly approaching and the Conference hotel is nearly sold out. The Conference will be held from November 1-4 in San Francisco. The last Conference in San Francisco sold out a month in advance--and that was without the reality of Dodd-Frank and mandatory Say-on-Pay hanging over our heads. With Conference registrations going strong--on track to reach nearly 2,000 attendees--this year's event promises to be just as exciting; register today to ensure you don't miss out.
NASPP "To Do" ListWe have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing "to do" list for you here in my blog.
A Government Shutdown Doesn’t Shut Down Your Stock Plan
We are now entering the third week of the government shutdown, just as work in corporate America is getting back into full swing after the holidays. You might be wondering how this will impact v...Read More
More Year-End Updates
In late October, I blogged about updates to the Social Security wage cap, Form 1040, and late filings o...Read More
U.S. Supreme Court: Railroad Company Stock Options Aren’t Taxable for RRTA Purposes
Clarification: The original version of this blog entry may have given readers the impression that the Supreme Court ruling exempted stock options at railroad companies from ...Read More
Say No to Withholding Taxes for Outside Directors (and Other Nonemployees)
There have been a couple of questions posted in the NASPP Discussion Forum lately about withholding taxes for outside directors or other nonemployees, so I thought this would make a good topic f...Read More
Two Wins on Share Withholding Litigation
Two courts have recently decided in favor of the defendants in suits brought by plaintiffs’ attorneys. The suits allege that transactions in which shares were withheld to cover taxes on RS...Read More