The leading association for the stock and executive compensation profession
Join a professional community 6,000+ members strong
Continue your investment in your professional development and community
Our member care center is here to assist you
Country-specific guidance for stock plan design and administration
Connect with a chapter in your area
Learn more about and engage your peers
Attend an NASPP event for unbeatable professional development and networking
Ask, find and provide answers to burning industry questions
Professional development to keep you at the top of your game
Expert industry perspectives and guidance for your daily work
Enrich you career and discover new opportunities
Save the date for the 28th annual event Sept. 22-25, 2020 in Washington DC! Registration opening soon.
I'm sure many of you are familiar with the limitations of the Black-Scholes model when it comes to valuing stock options for accounting purposes. Today I write about the problems of using the Black-Scholes model to determine grant sizes.
How Much Did Your CEO Make Off the Financial Crisis?A recent article in the Wall Street Journal ("Options Given During Crisis Spell Large Gains for CEOs" by Scott Thurm, April 26) discusses windfalls CEOs have seen in their stock options that were granted during the financial crisis. Many companies granted options to their CEOs when their stock price was at a low point. Because options are virtually always granted with a price equal to FMV (only 1% of respondents to the NASPP's 2010 Stock Plan Design Survey, co-sponsored by Deloitte, granted premium-priced options), this results in a low exercise price.
Further compounding the problem is the method most companies use to determine how many shares to grant. 70% of respondents to the NASPP survey determine grant sizes based on, at least in part, the value of the grant. And for 85% of those respondents, for stock options, that value is determined using an option pricing model, such as the Black-Scholes model. What happens to the option value computed under one of these models when the stock price is low? The option value will be low as well. The end result is a larger grant, assuming companies are trying to grant a specified value. In addition to having a nice low exercise price, options granted during the financial crisis were for many more shares that would normally have been granted.
The upshot is that when the stock price recovers, the options are worth a lot of money. A lot more money than options granted during times of economic abundance, which seems counter-intuitive. Generally, options with low exercise prices are coveted by employees and executives; it hardly seems necessary to make these options larger than comparatively higher-priced grants.
What Can You Do About It
Well, at this point, there may not be much that you can do about options that have already been granted--although see my May 13 blog ("Eleven and Counting") about GE and Lockheed Martin modifying options granted to their respective CEOs to vest based on performance. But you may be able to adjust your grant guidelines to address this sort of problem in the future. Here are some practices to consider:
Be sure to tune into the NASPP's upcoming webcast, "Equity Values of a Different Flavor," which will discuss some of the problems with using option pricing models for compensation planning purposes and possible solutions.
Another Chance to Qualify for Survey ResultsDue to overwhelming demand, we have extended the deadline to participate in NASPP's 2011 Domestic Stock Plan Administration Survey (co-sponsored by Deloitte) to June 10. Issuers must complete the survey to qualify to receive the full survey results. Register to complete the survey today--there won't be any more extensions!
New "Early-Bird" Rate for the NASPP ConferenceIf you missed the first early-bird deadline for the 19th Annual NASPP Conference, you can still save $200 on the Conference if you register by June 24. This deadline will not be extended--register for the Conference today, so you don't miss out.
NASPP "To Do" ListWe have so much going on here at the NASPP that it can be hard to keep track of it all, so I keep an ongoing "to do" list for you here in my blog.
Are You Overvaluing Your ESPP?
As I’m sure my readers know, under ASC 718, the fair value of an ESPP comprises three components, each of which is valued separately. But what you might not be aware of is that additional ...Read More
SEC Comments on Stock Compensation
PricewaterhouseCoopers has published a summary of SEC comments on stock compensation ("2013 SEC Comment Letter Tren...Read More