The Senate added a provision to the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 that will increase the number of employees subject to Section 162(m) from the current 5+ to 10+. Wait, what?
Did you know that when Section 162(m) was originally introduced into Congress, it was drafted to apply to all employees? That turned out to be too controversial and the bill was rejected. It was subsequently redrafted to apply to only the CEO, CFO, and the next top three highest paid officers (a max of five officers) and it is this version that was enacted into law in 1993.
Here’s another fun fact: the number of employees covered under Section 162(m) dropped to a max of four in 2007. At that time, a change in the SEC rules governing who is considered to be a named executive officer for proxy disclosure purposes inadvertently caused the CFO to no longer be covered under Section 162(m) (which references the proxy disclosure regulations for purposes of determining who is covered).
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act rectified this gap by amending Section 162(m) to expressly stipulate that the CFO is a covered employee. But it did more than that. It also stipulated that anyone serving as CEO or CFO during the year is covered under 162(m) even if no longer serving at the end of the year and that former officers who would have been among the top three highest paid officers except for the fact that they terminated prior to the end of the year are also covered.
Lastly, the TCJA implemented the “once covered, always covered” rule: beginning with 2017, any employees covered under Section 162(m) remain covered for the duration of the time they receive compensation from the company, regardless of role or amount of compensation received.
Although we tend to think of Section 162(m) as covering the top five highest paid officers, as a result of the TCJA amendments, the number of officers covered under Section 162(m) can now be considerably more than five.
Under Section 9708 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the number of employees covered under Section 162(m) will increase by another five employees. Here are three important things to know about the five additional covered employees:
If you are keeping score, we’re at almost a quarter century with no legislative changes to Section 162(m) followed by two expansions to the scope of Section 162(m) in the space of five years. You have to wonder if this is a trend: maybe Congress will continue to add covered employees in increments of five until all employees are covered as was originally intended.
Thanks to Carl Toppin of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton for bringing this development to my attention.
Final Section 162(m) Regulations
Late last year, the IRS issued final regulations under Section 162(m). Here’s what you need to know about them.
A quick refresher for those of you who ...Read More
Proposed Section 162(m) Regs: Corporate Transactions
This week I continue my coverage of the IRS’s newly Read More
Proposed Section 162(m) Regs: Clawbacks
As I blogged last week, the IRS has Read More
CEO Pay, Bananas, and Unintended Consequences
I am an avid listener of podcasts, so a friend recently pointed out to me that there is a Planet Money episode titled “Read More
Section 162(m) and Negative Discretion, Part 2
Back in September, I blogged that one unresolved question on the new Se...Read More