The leading association for the stock and executive compensation profession
Join a professional community 6,000+ members strong
Continue your investment in your professional development and community
Our member care center is here to assist you
Country-specific guidance for stock plan design and administration
Connect with a chapter in your area
Learn more about and engage your peers
Attend an NASPP event for unbeatable professional development and networking
Ask, find and provide answers to burning industry questions
Professional development to keep you at the top of your game
Expert industry perspectives and guidance for your daily work
Enrich you career and discover new opportunities
Be there for the 27th annual event Sept. 16-19, 2019 in New Orleans!
Back in 2014, I blogged about a failed proposal in the California senate to tax companies based on their CEO pay ratio. I pondered whether the state senate’s failure was the end or just the beginning of CEO pay ratio taxes.
Turns out, it was just the beginning. In 2016, Jenn Namazi blogged about the first CEO pay ratio tax to be enacted—in Portland, Oregon—as well as states considering similar taxes. Now that the first CEO pay ratios have been disclosed, activity in this area is ramping up. There are now at least six states with pending proposals related to CEO pay ratios. A memo by law firm Andrews Kurth summarizes them.
Chief among them is California, where the state senate is considering a new proposal that would increase the corporate tax rate when a company’s CEO pay ratio exceeds 50, as follows:
(The current corporate tax rate is 8.84%, which is the rate that would apply to companies with a ratio between 0 and 50.)
Given that California is now the world’s fifth largest economy (we just passed the UK—go CA!), this tax would likely have a bigger impact on a lot more companies than the Portland tax. But it’s hard to enact new taxes in California; passage requires a two-thirds majority in both the state senate and assembly. Democrats are currently one seat short of the votes necessary in both branches of the legislature (the bill is sponsored by a Senator Skinner, a Democrat), so they would need at least two Republicans to vote for it. And the governor also has to sign the bill.
Other cities and states considering similar proposals include: