The leading association for the stock and executive compensation profession
Join a professional community 6,000+ members strong
Continue your investment in your professional development and community
Our member care center is here to assist you
Country-specific guidance for stock plan design and administration
Connect with a chapter in your area
Learn more about and engage your peers
Attend an NASPP event for unbeatable professional development and networking
Ask, find and provide answers to burning industry questions
Professional development to keep you at the top of your game
Expert industry perspectives and guidance for your daily work
Enrich you career and discover new opportunities
Save the date for the 28th annual event Sept. 22-25, 2020 in Washington DC! Registration opening soon.
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that all states must permit marriage between same sex couples and all states must recognize marriages performed in other states, including those of same sex couples. In essence, marriage is now simply marriage for all. What impact does this ruling have on your stock plans? I'll cover that in today's NASPP Blog.
Back in Time
While the Obergefell decision has been described a landmark one, the real mechanical impact to stock plans arrived two years earlier - in June 2013. In deciding the case of U.S. v. Windsor, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional. The result of that decision was that same-sex couples recognized as married under the laws were they live were considered married for federal purposes. See the NASPP Blog "The Supreme Court and Stock Compensation" (July 18, 2013) for more information on that case.
The Obergefell decision has resulted in marriage equality in all states. However, the Windsor decision in 2013 sparked several changes to employee benefits in states where same sex marriages were recognized. According to a myStockOptions.com FAQ on the topic, "While the Obergefell decision was a more significant societal landmark, the Windsor decision had a bigger impact on stock plans. It led companies to look through benefit plans and policies, as well administrative procedures, for situations where marital status matters. As a result, companies had already made many changes even before the Obergefell ruling in June 2015. Among more than 1,000 federal laws and regulations touched by the rulings are those which affect the design and administration of employee benefit plans. In short, spousal provisions in employee benefit plans should treat same-sex spouses and opposite-sex spouses in the same way. While stock plans are not affected by federal laws in the same way as qualified retirement plans (e.g. a 401(k) plan) or health and welfare plans, the changes that will be required in these other benefit plans will probably lead to similar modifications in stock plan documents."
While much of the groundwork was already laid in the Windsor decision, there are still several things companies need to consider in ensuring their benefits and stock plans are consistent in application to an employee's spouse:
In addition, the SEC and IRS have already clarified that same sex couples who are legally married are considered to be a spouse, husband or wife regardless of where they live. That guidance stands after the Obergefell decision.
While there are some housekeeping items to be done to ensure companies are not consistent in their application the definition of "spouse", "husband" and "wife", I don't expect it to be a significant time commitment or development in terms of far reaching implications to stock plans.
myStockOptions.com FAQ: Are Stock Options Affected by the Supreme Court's Decisions on Marriage Equality?
SEC Guidance on "Spouse" and "Marriage"
IRS Revenue Ruling 2013-17
IRS Notice 2014-19
Divorce: The Impact on Equity Awards - Part 2
Last week, I blogged about whether companies should have a transfer policy in place for handing stock plan awards/shares in a divorce scenario ("Read More
Divorce: The Impact on Equity Awards – Part 1
In a session at this year’s NASPP Annual Conference (“Read More
Insider Trading: Would You Sell Your Career for $100,000?
I’ve followed the topic of insider trading over many seasons and SEC enforcement actions, and the one thing that I probably find most fascinating is the “who” becomes entangled...Read More
Implementing an Auto Exercise Program for Stock Options
Companies that grant stock options know that there are a few core challenges that have maintained their existence throughout the life span of these types of arrangements. Among them: how to handle ...Read More
Is Spousal Consent Necessary for Equity Awards?
Occasionally, I am asked if it is necessary for employees’ spouses to accept the equity awards granted to employees, in addition to the employees’ acceptance. In my experience, ...Read More