The leading association for the stock and executive compensation profession
Join a professional community 6,000+ members strong
Continue your investment in your professional development and community
Our member care center is here to assist you
Country-specific guidance for stock plan design and administration
Connect with a chapter in your area
Learn more about and engage your peers
Attend an NASPP event for unbeatable professional development and networking
Ask, find and provide answers to burning industry questions
Professional development to keep you at the top of your game
Expert industry perspectives and guidance for your daily work
Enrich you career and discover new opportunities
The 26th annual event comes to San Diego this September 25-28!
Last year, a Special Committee of the Board of Directors of Equifax announced that it had found no cases of insider trading among executives. But the SEC isn’t giving up quite so easily; it has filed a compliant against a lower ranking executive (not covered in the Special Committee’s report).
The SEC’s claim is interesting because the individual in this case (the CIO of a business unit) had not been officially informed of the security breach at the time of his trade. Instead, the SEC alleges that he deduced that there had been a major breach because of a project he was asked to support.
Here’s the sequence of events, according to the SEC complaint:
The SEC’s position is that even though the CIO had not been told that Equifax was breached, he had figured this out (and I can see how the internet searches might support this position); thus, he held material nonpublic information when he exercised his option.
The CIO realized $950,000 on the option exercise and the SEC estimates the loss he avoided at $117,000—that’s just 12% of his proceeds. But he’s now likely to lose a lot more—even if the SEC doesn’t prevail, he’s going to have to spend a lot of money on lawyer fees to fight the claim. And if the SEC prevails or if he settles, there will be penalties. He also lost out on a promotion to global CIO and was forced to resign (the trade violated Equifax’s insider trading compliance policy).
We don’t know all of the implications because the complaint hasn’t been resolved yet. But the complaint speaks to the importance of educating employees on insider trading laws, to protect both the company and employees. A couple of key takeaways:
In the News This Week
This week a couple of news blurbs caught my eye, so I figured I'd summarize them in today's blog. The first involves LinkedIn's CEO, the second involves another insider trading case (along with ...Read More
Charitable Donations of Stock
We’re into fall already, and before we know it the end of the year will be upon us. This upcoming period of time is a busy one for stock administration professionals. In the mix of activity that...Read More
Here are the results to my random questions in last week's blog entry.
Terminated Employees &...Read More
The Supreme Court and Insider Trading
Earlier this year I blogged about the fact that insider trading isn't technically illegal. It sounds far fetched, but it's true. There isn't a law on the books that specifically defines insider ...Read More
Insider Trading Isn't Illegal?
I think it's safe to say that if you work in this industry, you're familiar with the concept of insider trading. What do we know? You can't trade in a company's stock based on material non-publi...Read More