As noted last week, the FASB has issued the final Accounting Standards Update to ASC 718. Here are a few more tidbits about it.
The ASU Has a Name
Handily, the ASU now has a name that we can use to refer to it: ASU 2016-09. Now I can stop calling it "the ASU to ASC 718," which was awkward—too many acronyms.
One surprise to me is how the transition works if the ASU is adopted in an interim period other than the company's first fiscal quarter. When the ASU is adopted in Q2, Q3, or Q4, the update requires that any adjustments required for the transition be calculated as of the beginning of the fiscal year. Consequently, where companies adopt the ASU in these periods, they will end up having to recalculate the earlier periods in their fiscal year (and restate these periods wherever they appear in their financial statements), even if the transition method is prospective or modified retrospective, which normally would not require recalculation or restatement of prior periods.
For example, if a company adopts the ASU in its second fiscal quarter, the company will have to go back recalculate APIC and tax expense as required under tax accounting approach specified in the ASU for its first fiscal quarter. Likewise, if the company decides to account for forfeitures as they occur, the company will have to recalculate expense for the first fiscal quarter under the new approach and record a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year, not the beginning of Q2.
While I can understand the rationale for this requirement, it is different than how I expected the transition to work for interim period adoptions.
No Other Surprises
The ASU 2016-09 seems to be an accurate reflection of the decisions made at the FASB's meeting last November and documented ad nauseam here in this blog. I still haven't read every last word of the amended language in the ASC 718, but I don't think there are any other significant surprises.
For more information on ASU 2016-09, be sure to tune in to the NASPP May webcast, "ASC 718 in Motion: The FASB's Amendments."
Accounting for Cash Settlement of Equity Awards
This week, I return to my Read More
SEC Offers Relief on Tax Expense Adjustments
As I noted back in May ("An Expensive Tax Cut"), companies will have to adjust ...Read More
An Expensive Tax Cut
I have another riddle for you: When does a tax cut result in more tax expense? When you've been recording deferred tax assets for years based on a higher tax rate, that's when.
What t...Read More
Jettisoning Estimated Forfeiture Rates
Now that ASU 2016-09 allows companies to record expense for service-based awards without applying an estimated forfeiture rate to the accruals (see "Read More
Update to ASC 718: Survey Says
For today's blog entry, I have the results of the NASPP's Quick Survey on ASC 718, presented in a nifty i...Read More